Posted to Monash Weekly (27/4/2013) on 30/4/2013 at 10:45 AM
Commenting on "Monash dogfight: Legal fees bite in protracted battle"
http://www.monashweekly.com.au/story/1460000/monash-dogfight-legal-fees-bite-in-protracted-battle/
It is a matter of "damned if they do, or damned if they don't".
We can argue that random breath or drug test, breast screening, and child vaccination, etc are waste of public money. Many drivers will not be found exceeding .05 alcohol level in blood or tested positive under the influence of drugs. Many women will live happily without the stress of carrying the life threatening time bombs in their bodies. As for child vaccination, only a infinitesimal small number will limp with polio or die of measles.
It is not an easy task for Council officers to identify dogs with 100% certainty as dangerous dogs. They are not experts in this field, and if are, they will not be working with the Council, but earning mega bucks in such specialised area.
I find it difficult to understand the psyche of many people keeping animals including dogs that attack people viciously without being provoked. People learn self defence is not that they intend to kill and seriously injure others. People owning weapons are meant to protect themselves in time of danger, not to use them on their foes.
Owners of dangerous dogs have an obligation towards the well being of fellow humans to surrender the dogs. Obviously, the best prevention is not to own one. Should an owner have any suspicion about the breed of the dog, or the dog's appearance resembles a dangerous dog, check out with the breeder with written certification or with a specialist. They do take their dogs to a vet, don't they?
Edited by Monash Weekly
I find it difficult to understand the psyche of many people keeping animals including dogs that attack people viciously without being provoked. People learn self defence is not that they intend to kill and seriously injure others. People owning weapons are meant to protect themselves in time of danger, not to use them on their foes.
Owners of dangerous dogs have an obligation towards the well being of fellow humans to surrender the dogs. Obviously, the best prevention is not to own one. Should an owner have any suspicion about the breed of the dog, or the dog's appearance resembles a dangerous dog, check out with the breeder with written certification or with a specialist.
Commenting on "Monash dogfight: Legal fees bite in protracted battle"
http://www.monashweekly.com.au/story/1460000/monash-dogfight-legal-fees-bite-in-protracted-battle/
It is a matter of "damned if they do, or damned if they don't".
We can argue that random breath or drug test, breast screening, and child vaccination, etc are waste of public money. Many drivers will not be found exceeding .05 alcohol level in blood or tested positive under the influence of drugs. Many women will live happily without the stress of carrying the life threatening time bombs in their bodies. As for child vaccination, only a infinitesimal small number will limp with polio or die of measles.
It is not an easy task for Council officers to identify dogs with 100% certainty as dangerous dogs. They are not experts in this field, and if are, they will not be working with the Council, but earning mega bucks in such specialised area.
I find it difficult to understand the psyche of many people keeping animals including dogs that attack people viciously without being provoked. People learn self defence is not that they intend to kill and seriously injure others. People owning weapons are meant to protect themselves in time of danger, not to use them on their foes.
Owners of dangerous dogs have an obligation towards the well being of fellow humans to surrender the dogs. Obviously, the best prevention is not to own one. Should an owner have any suspicion about the breed of the dog, or the dog's appearance resembles a dangerous dog, check out with the breeder with written certification or with a specialist. They do take their dogs to a vet, don't they?
Edited by Monash Weekly
I find it difficult to understand the psyche of many people keeping animals including dogs that attack people viciously without being provoked. People learn self defence is not that they intend to kill and seriously injure others. People owning weapons are meant to protect themselves in time of danger, not to use them on their foes.
Owners of dangerous dogs have an obligation towards the well being of fellow humans to surrender the dogs. Obviously, the best prevention is not to own one. Should an owner have any suspicion about the breed of the dog, or the dog's appearance resembles a dangerous dog, check out with the breeder with written certification or with a specialist.